Back

Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine childhood vaccination uptake in the Netherlands

Pijpers, J.; Haverkate, M.; van Gaalen, R.; Hahne, S.; de Melker, H.; van den Hof, S.

2026-02-20 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.19.26346601 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInitial reports from the Netherlands indicate a decline in routine childhood vaccination uptake during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, with emerging evidence of reduced parental vaccine confidence. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine childhood vaccination uptake. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study including all children born in the Netherlands in 2016-2024. First-dose DTaP-IPV vaccination status by age six months was obtained from the national immunisation register. National trends in vaccination uptake across pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods were assessed using interrupted time series analyses. To further assess the independent effect of the pandemic, a matched-sibling analysis compared vaccination uptake within families before, during and after the pandemic. ResultsInterrupted time series analyses showed significant immediate decreases in vaccination uptake both at the start and end of the pandemic, accompanied by a continuing downward trend during the pandemic (OR 0.984, 95%CI 0.982-0.985) that further declined after its end (OR 0.995, 95%CI 0.994-0.997). In the matched-sibling analysis children eligible during and after the pandemic had lower odds of being vaccinated (pandemic: OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.55-0.80; post-pandemic: OR 0.20, 95%CI 0.17-0.25) compared to their pre-pandemic siblings. Also, later birth order was associated with lower odds compared to first-born siblings (second-born: OR 0.42, 95%CI 0.37-0.48). ConclusionsBoth analyses indicate a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parental vaccination decisions, which may reflect lingering pandemic effects or new post-pandemic factors, highlighting the need for further research into the drivers of vaccination uptake changes in the post-pandemic era.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
10
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%