Back

Population specific bottlenecks inflated differentiation measures of Louisiana black bear and negate subspecific status

Puckett, E. E.; Clendenin, H. R.

2026-02-19 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706691 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Significant debate has revolved around the delimitation of subspecific boundaries relative to conservation policy, and specifically how best to maximize limited resources. The conservation of subspecies captures intraspecific genetic diversity and aids in the long-term preservation of adaptive potential. Here, we evaluate patterns of neutral and adaptive genomic variation across the eastern lineage of the American black bear. We specifically assess the relative impact of phylogeographic history and local adaptation on differentiation of subpopulations in Louisiana, which were federally protected as a subspecies from 1992-2016. Despite high values of genetic differentiation (Fst >0.127) of these focal populations, we show that serial founder events during range expansion into eastern North America and multiple bottlenecks drove patterns of diversity within Louisiana. While we attribute initial population divergence between Louisiana subpopulations to east-west shifts of the Mississippi River between 6.2 - 2.7kya, drift accelerated following bottlenecks that were likely due to indigenous societies cultural and land-use changes and later to impacts of European fur traders. We further show that local adaptation has had a smaller impact (4.6%) than phylogeography (30.1%) on the distribution of genomic variation across this lineage. The strongest drivers of adaptive variation include mean annual temperature and monthly precipitation variation, where northern populations have substantial derived variation. Our genomic assessment, in conjunction with weak phenotypic data, does not support the continued recognition of Ursus americanus luteolus as a subspecies of American black bear. Continued genetic conservation efforts should focus on maintaining or increasing diversity, while supporting ongoing successes of demographic recovery.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.4%
2
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.1%
4
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
12
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
20
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
24
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%