Back

Intratumoral plasma cells are required for activation of CD8+ T cells and success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in de novo MPNSTs

Lingo, J. J.; Reis, R.; Allamargot, C.; Raygoza Garay, J. A.; Kaemmer, C. A.; Elias, E. C.; Voigt, E.; Jabbari, A.; Wilhelm, C. R.; Boyden, A. W.; Karandikar, N. J.; Breheny, P.; Meyerholz, D. K.; Dodd, R. D.; Houtman, J. C.; Darbro, B. W.; Quelle, D. E.

2026-02-20 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706680 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe role of intratumoral plasma cells in immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has never been tested although their presence is linked with improved patient response and survival. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are deadly sarcomas with minimal responsiveness to ICB therapies. Strikingly, drugs inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) and MEK sensitize de novo MPNSTs to immunotherapy targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which correlates with increased intratumoral plasma cells. Here, we tested if plasma cells mediate the MPNST response to anti-PD-L1 therapy. MethodsAnti-tumor activity of PD-L1 inhibition, with or without CDK4/6-MEK inhibition, was measured in de novo MPNSTs within wild-type versus plasma cell-deficient mice. Plasma cell-dependent effects of CDK4/6-MEK inhibition on priming the MPNST immune environment were determined by single cell transcriptomics and immunostaining. FindingsMPNSTs lacking plasma cells failed to respond to anti-PD-L1 monotherapy and were no longer sensitized to immunotherapy by CDK4/6-MEK inhibition. Plasma cell-deficient MPNSTs exposed to CDK4/6-MEK inhibitors had impaired antigen presentation on major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) and decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration and activation. Complementary analyses of human sarcomas showed increased intratumoral plasma cell signatures prognose better patient survival. InterpretationPlasma cells favorably remodel the tumor immune environment by increasing CD8+ T cell infiltration and are critical for successful ICB therapy in MPNSTs. This work may help inform ICB treatment strategies and cancer patient stratification for many different tumor types. FundingThis research was supported by University of Iowa Sarcoma Research Program awards and NIH grants T34-GM141143, T32-GM067795, F31-CA281312, P30-CA086862, and R01-NS119322. Research in ContextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSFor many types of cancer, intratumoral plasma cells have been correlated with better patient survival and improved response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. However, the biology underlying those associations is not understood and no study has examined the requirement of plasma cells in immunotherapy response. Compelling data in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) showed that dual kinase inhibition of oncogenic CDK4/6 and MEK induced intratumoral plasma cell accumulation and sensitized tumors to ICB therapy. While CDK4/6-MEK inhibition is known to enhance antitumor immunity in other tumor types by CD8+ T cells or natural killer (NK) cells, a role for plasma cells has never been explored. Added value of this studyStudies were performed in MPNSTs, an under-researched cancer that normally responds poorly to ICB monotherapies. This is the first investigation to show that intratumoral plasma cells are essential for successful ICB therapy and they support anti-tumor immunity by promoting a pro-inflammatory, CD8+ T cell state involving MHC-I antigen presentation. Findings provide new insight into immunomodulatory effects of CDK4/6-MEK inhibitor therapies, revealing plasma cells are needed for those drugs to activate CD8+ T cell mediated antitumor immunity. Implications of all the available evidenceThe fundamental advance in understanding how plasma cells promote successful ICB immunotherapy is likely applicable to other solid tumors and may guide novel therapeutic strategies in which plasma cell-inducing agents are combined with ICB antibodies. Moreover, an increased presence of intratumoral plasma cells in tumor specimens may streamline clinical decisions regarding which patients are most likely to benefit from ICB therapy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
4
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
20
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
23
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
25
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%