Back

Temperature effects on taste preferences are influenced by TRPM8

Zumpano, K. T.; Lemon, C. H.

2026-02-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.18.706655 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Taste perception is influenced by stimulus and oral temperature. Change in oral temperature modulates trigeminal neurons. Whether trigeminal thermal sensing interacts with taste is unknown. Here we studied temperature influences on mouse taste preferences and how they could change following silencing of TRPM8 (transient receptor potential melastatin 8) - a thermoreceptor supporting cool and warm temperature coding by trigeminal neurons. Female and male TRPM8 gene deficient and C57BL/6J (B6) control mice (n = 69) entered thermolickometry tests where they sampled taste solutions at cool (15{degrees}C) and warm (30{degrees}C) temperatures during brief-access (10-sec long) exposure trials, which capture oral sensory/tongue control of licking behavior. Taste solutions included innately avoided bitter quinine (0.03 and 0.3 mM) and preferred sugars (sucrose or glucose, 100 and 500 mM). Mice were respectively maintained under water restriction or water-replete conditions during quinine and sugar tests, which were conducted separately. Analyses revealed that 15{degrees}C enhanced, while 30{degrees}C reduced, licks to quinine in both B6 and TRPM8 deficient mice, which responded similarly (p > 0.05). In contrast, licks to static concentrations of sugars trended towards enhancement by 30{degrees}C, compared to 15{degrees}C, in male B6 mice but were suppressed, and inhibited, by 30{degrees}C (p < 0.05) in male TRPM8 deficient mice. This result agrees with prior studies that show warmth normally facilitates sweetness and that 30{degrees}C stimulation of oral tissues becomes anomalously aversive in TRPM8 deficient mice. These data provide initial evidence that TRPM8 thermosensory influences interact with sugar taste preferences, which may reflect a trigeminal-taste cross-modal phenomenon.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
4
Chemical Senses
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
16
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
18
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%