Comparative Biology at Single-Cell Resolution: Rigorous Matching of Atlases for Cross-Species Analysis
Jacques, M.-A.; Gottgens, B.; Marioni, J. C.
Show abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics has revolutionised developmental biology by providing an unprecedented, fine-grained view of cellular lineages. However, our ability to compare species and distinguish universal from species-specific developmental principles remains limited by biological and technical variability. To address this, we introduce RIMA (RIgorous Matching of Atlases), a method for quantitatively comparing transcriptomic atlases across species at near-single-cell resolution. RIMA uses a novel computational approach to identify matching cell states across atlases and leverages this to enable quantitative comparative analyses. Applied to gastrulation in mouse, rabbit, and macaque, RIMA recapitulates a developmental hourglass pattern, identifying a molecular similarity bottleneck at the onset of organogenesis. It further uncovers conserved developmental programmes, including a core set of transcription factors driving epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and highlights transcriptional boosts of erythroid differentiation genes that are conserved across species but exhibit shifted onset timing. Furthermore, RIMA enables cross-species prediction of gene expression, augmenting sparse atlases and correcting differences between model and target organisms. Beyond cross-species comparisons, RIMAs framework extends naturally to any setting where large systematic differences exist across datasets, including in vitro to in vivo comparisons, opening new avenues for improving biological models and advancing translational research.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.