Back

4D Single-Cell Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals Dynamic Morphogenetic Gradients and Regenerative Domains in Planarians

Han, K.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Lin, Y.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Guo, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, W.; Liang, L.; Wei, X.; Zhou, L.; Mao, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, W.; Pan, H.; Yang, T.; Zhang, H.; Su, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, W.; Liu, L.; Christensen, S. T.; Fei, J.; Liu, X.; Fan, G.; Li, H.; Gu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Pei, G.; Xu, X.; Zeng, A.; Xu, M.

2026-02-19 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706529 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Regeneration relies on precise spatiotemporal gene expression and cellular responses to establish tissue identity and body patterning. Using high-resolution Stereo-seq (715 nm) on 353 sections from 16 whole animals at 8 regeneration timepoints, we constructed a 4D spatiotemporal transcriptomic map of planarian regeneration. Our analysis captured 36 refined cell types from 3,508,004 segmented cells, enabling genome-wide transcriptional imputation of gene expression dynamics across body axes at cellular, tissue, and organismal scales. We identified dynamic positional gradients and distinct spatially distributed cell types during regeneration, including an injury-induced Anterior Regenerative Zone (ARZ). The ARZ exhibited enriched positional signals in epidermal, muscle, and neural cells and was regulated by Mediator 8, which is crucial for polarity remodeling and blastema formation. This study provides a comprehensive spatial molecular and cellular map of regenerative processes, highlighting injury-induced spatial domains and key regulatory factors in planarian regeneration. We also provide an interactive web portal, offering a valuable resource for exploring and analyzing regeneration mechanisms in a spatiotemporal context.

Published in GigaScience (predicted rank #26) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.