Back

Cortical Tracking of Speech and Music Predicts Reading Ability in Adults

Allen, S. C.; Koukouvinis, S.; Varjopuro, S. M.; Keitel, A.

2026-03-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.18.706526 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cortical tracking of acoustic features is essential for the neural processing of continuous stimuli such as speech and music. For example, it has been shown that children with dyslexia show atypical cortical tracking. This tracking may therefore reflect a fundamental auditory temporal processing mechanism supporting literacy more generally. In the current pre-registered study, we tested the hypothesis that cortical tracking of speech and music predicts reading ability in healthy young adults (N = 32), evaluated through a lexical decision task. Participants first completed an online session in which they performed a lexical decision task to assess their reading skills. This was followed by an electroencephalography (EEG) session, in which participants listened to a naturalistic short story and a music track. Using mutual information, we showed that neural activity aligned to both speech and music across a wide range of frequencies. Interestingly, cortical tracking was stronger for speech at very low frequencies, while it was stronger for music at higher frequencies. Critically, cortical tracking predicted reaction times in the lexical decision task in a frequency-dependent manner: stronger delta-band tracking (~1-3 Hz) for both speech and music was associated with faster reaction times, whereas stronger alpha-band tracking (~12 Hz) for speech was associated with slower reaction times. These findings remained significant even when controlling for stimulus type, age, musical experience and reading enjoyment. These results suggest that cortical tracking of speech and music reflect a domain-general temporal processing mechanism that is associated with reading ability beyond stimulus-specific features, and beyond development. These findings advance the neurobiological underpinnings of literacy and could potentially be leveraged for developing new reading interventions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.0%
2
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
7
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
12
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
16
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
17
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%