Back

Functional and sensitivity profiling of theKITMutation Landscape in Melanoma

Yeung, S. F.; Chan, M. S. M.; Law, C. T. Y.; Law, A. C. H.; Lee, C.; Leung, A. M. F.; Chau, M. P. K.; Chan, H. H. Y.; Chen, J. X.; Ko, B. C. B.; Chan, K. K. L.; Cho, W. C.; Tsui, S. K. W.

2026-02-20 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Melanoma in Asia presents a unique epidemiological profile, with a higher prevalence of acral and mucosal subtypes compared to Western populations. While KIT mutations are found in up to 15% of Asian melanoma cases, clinical outcomes with KIT inhibitors have been modest due to heterogeneous mutation profiles and a lack of specific patient selection criteria. This study characterizes the landscape of KIT mutations in melanoma using the GENIE database, identifying 86 recurrent hotspots, many of which are variants of unknown significance (VUS). We validated drug sensitivities for key mutations using in vitro and in vivo models. Our results indicate that while the L576P mutation is highly sensitive to multiple inhibitors, the N822K mutation shows resistance to imatinib but responds to sunitinib, nilotinib, and nintedanib. These findings highlight the necessity of genotype-guided therapeutic strategies and provide a rationale for future clinical trials combining broad-spectrum KIT inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Translational SignificanceMelanoma subtypes prevalent in Asia, specifically acral and mucosal melanoma, frequently harbor KIT mutations but show poor response rates (23-26%) to the standard-of-care inhibitor, imatinib. This study challenges the current clinical practice of treating all KIT-mutated melanomas uniformly. We demonstrate that specific recurrent mutations, such as N822K, are intrinsically resistant to imatinib but highly sensitive to broad-spectrum inhibitors like sunitinib and nintedanib. By establishing a comprehensive "lookup table" of drug sensitivities for both common and previously uncharacterized KIT variants, this work provides the evidence base required to transition from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to a genotype-guided precision medicine strategy. Furthermore, validating these targets informs the design of next-generation clinical trials, particularly those combining optimal KIT inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade to improve survival in currently underserved patient populations.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
14.7%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.4%
4
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
6
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
11
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
28
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%