Back

Continuous foraging behavior shapes patch-leaving decisions in pigeons: A 3D tracking study

Hidalgo Gadea, G.; Güntürkün, O.; Flaim, M. E.; Anselme, P.

2026-02-19 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.18.706261 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optimal foraging behavior is a key component of successful adaptations to natural environments. Understanding how animals decide to stay near food or to leave it for another food patch gives us insights into the underlying cognitive mechanisms that govern adaptive behaviors. 3D pose tracking was used to determine how pigeons exploit a 4 square meter arena with two separate platforms (i.e. food patches) whose absolute and relative elevations were manipulated. Detailed kinematic features of foraging and traveling behaviors were quantified using automated video tracking, without a need for manual coding. Our computational approach captured continuous, high-dimensional movement patterns and enabled precise quantification of travel costs between patches. Combined with mixed-effects survival analysis, our fine-grained behavioral tracking provided detailed insight into the moment-by-moment dynamics of patch-leaving decisions of pigeons. As expected from behavior optimization models, our results showed a preference to visit a ground food platform first, and longer latencies to leave an elevated platform. Foraging activity significantly decreased throughout the session, with shorter visits, less pecks per visit, and a decrease in inter-peck variability. However, a mixed-effects Cox regression modeled pigeons patch-leaving probability, demonstrating that current and cumulative foraging parameters between patches significantly enhanced the models predictive power beyond patch accessibility (i.e., beyond travel costs). This suggests that pigeons integrate both current environmental cues and their individual foraging history when making patch-leaving decisions. Our findings are discussed in relation to the marginal value theorem and optimal foraging theory.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.2%
2
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
8
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.8%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
16
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
18
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
19
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%