Back

Systematic functional drug testing in patient-derived models reveals ex vivo sensitivities associated with clinical outcome in rare solid tumors

Paluncic, J.; Carrero, Z. I.; Fischer, L. K.; Schulz, J. P.; Hanf, D.; Jady, A.; GutierrezTenorio, F.; Klimova, A.; Dagostino, C.; Wolf, I.; Huether, M.; Werner, M.; PourabbasTahvildari, P.; Hrabovska, S.; Santos, M. G.; Young, E.; Mateska, I.; Schulze, S.; Prause, R.; Peterziel, H.; Kirchberg, J.; Stange, D. E.; Schmidt, B.; Huebschmann, D.; Scholl, C.; Schneider, M.; Westphal, D.; Wurm, A. A.; Oehme, I.; Witt, O.; Pablik, J.; Venkataramani, V.; Heilig, C. E.; Kreutzfeldt, S.; Horak, P.; Moehrmann, L.; Kerle, I.; Richter, S. M.; Weitz, J.; Schaser, K.; Richter, D.; Frohling, S.; Heining, C.;

2026-02-19 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.705724 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rare cancers are individually uncommon but collectively represent a substantial share of cancer burden, with limited systemic treatment options for many entities. Molecular profiling identifies targetable alterations, but actionable findings are limited and responses can vary despite a matched target. This motivates complementary approaches that directly assess tumor drug response. Here, we establish a biopsy-compatible ex vivo drug sensitivity testing platform optimized for low input and reproducibility. Patient-derived material was tested either directly or following ex vivo expansion. Functional profiling was performed within clinically relevant timelines across models from 126 patients with rare advanced solid tumors. Drug responses were consistent between model types. In most samples, we identified at least one potentially active compound, supporting feasibility at biopsy-scale. High in vitro sensitivity was associated with clinical benefit and progression-free survival. These findings support functional drug sensitivity testing as a complementary component in precision oncology for adults with rare cancers. Statement of SignificanceThis study presents a biopsy-compatible drug sensitivity testing platform for phenotype-based therapy stratification in rare cancers. It identifies actionable ex vivo drug responses and shows associations with clinical outcome in patients treated with screened therapies. These findings support functional testing as a complementary additional layer of stratification for therapeutic prioritization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.9%
4
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
6
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
8
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
9
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%