Back

Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Overweight/Obesity in Routine Clinical Practice

Guo, W.; Wang, M.; Shin, J.; Li, F.; O'Brien, E. C.; Bortfeld, K.; Zhao, A.; Glover, L.; McDevitt, R.; Kalapura, C.; Wu, S.; Shibeika, S.; Aymes, S.; Porter, M.; Mac Grory, B.; Lusk, J. B.

2026-02-20 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.18.26346594 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsThe glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide has demonstrated efficacy for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients with overweight/obesity without diabetes mellitus. However, the comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 RA versus other antiobesity medications (e.g. phentermine-topiramate) not been evaluated. MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational, cohort study using target trial emulation methodology using the Truveta electronic health record database of more than 120 million patients. Adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) >=27 kg/m2, a history of cardiovascular disease (prior ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction, or known coronary artery disease, heart failure, or peripheral artery disease) without diabetes mellitus were included in the study. The primary endpoint was time to first major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event (MACCE, defined as stroke or myocardial infarction). ResultsIn total, 35,240 were included in the bupropion-naltrexone versus GLP-1 RA comparison, and 27,051 were included in the phentermine-topiramate versus GLP-1 RA comparison. In the pre-weighting cohort, GLP-1 RA use was associated with decreased hazard of MACCE compared to bupropion-naltrexone (HR 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.69]) and phentermine-topiramate (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.30-0.60]). In the propensity score-overlap weighted cohort, GLP-1 RA prescription was not associated with a lower hazard of MACCE than bupropion-naltrexone (aHR 0.69 [95% CI 0.47-1.00]) but was associated with a lower hazard compared to phentermine-topiramate (aHR 0.61 [95% CI 0.41-0.91]; adjusted absolute rate difference 0.98 per 1000 person-years). ConclusionsPrescription of a GLP-1 RA was associated with a lower risk of subsequent MACCE than phentermine-topiramate.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.2%
3
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
24
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%