Back

Biomarkers for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Towards Validation of a Biomarker-Enhanced Risk Model

Solomon, D. H.; Santacroce, L.; Giles, J.; Rist, P. M.; Everett, B. M.; Liao, K. P.; Paudel, M.; Shadick, N. A.; Weinblatt, M. E.; Bathon, J. M.; Demler, O. V.

2026-02-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.18.26346592 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular (CV) disease risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is the leading cause of mortality. Improved CV risk stratification tools in RA could enhance use of preventative care and improve outcomes. MethodsWe previously studied biomarkers of CV disease - adiponectin, hsCRP, Lp(a), osteoprotegerin (OPG), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT), serum amyloid A (SAA), YKL-40, soluble TNF receptor1 (sTNFR1) -- that were associated with CV risk. In the current study, these biomarkers were tested in an unrelated external cohort of RA patients followed at a single academic medical center without a history of CV events. CV events were identified through Medicare and Medicaid administrative data or through medical record review of self-reported events. Biomarkers were assessed at cohort entry among a nested cohort of cases and controls, matched 1:1 on sex and age. Analyses were conducted using conditional logistic regression. We examined whether the candidate biomarkers added to clinical CV risk factors improved model prediction, using the area under the curve (AUC) as well as the net reclassification index (NRI). ResultsFrom a cohort of 1,345 eligible patients with RA, we identified 123 patients with confirmed CV events. Cases and matched controls were typical of RA: median age 63 years, 77% women, RA disease duration 11 years, 72% seropositive, 85% used a biologic or conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, 58% non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 30% oral glucocorticoids. From the candidate biomarkers, LASSO regression selected hsTnT and sTNFR1 as associated with CV events. The AUC for models that included only clinical risk factors was 0.758 (95% CI 0.689-0.829); after adding hsTnT and sTNFR1, the AUC increased to 0.802 (95% CI 0.718-0.998). The NRI of the model with biomarkers was 16.3%, with improvement only observed in patients who did not have CV events during follow-up. ConclusionsAdding selected biomarkers to clinical risk factors enhances the discrimination of models predicting CV events among patients with RA. These risk models require prospective testing to see if they have value in clinical practice decision-making regarding preventative care.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
2
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
15
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
19
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
25
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%