Balanced deep learning on multi-omics networks identifies molecular subgroups of pathological brain aging

BackgroundNeurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimers disease (AD), exhibit substantial clinical and molecular heterogeneity, complicating accurate diagnosis and development of effective therapies. Although multi-omics profiling provides unprecedented molecular resolution, systematic integration of high-dimensional, imbalanced data modalities with disease-relevant biological networks remains a methodological challenge. MethodsWe developed a network-informed multi-omics integration framework that combines data-driven molecular networks with brain transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data from 356 participants in the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROS/MAP). Utilizing 25 functional, data-driven multi-omics groups (DAD-MUGs) derived by graph embedding from the AD Atlas, co-expression-guided feature extraction and systematic two-phase feature balancing were applied to derive representative molecular features, which were subsequently learned using DAD-MUG-specific autoencoders to generate compact multi-omics expression scores. These were then used to identify molecular subgroups via hierarchical clustering. Subgroup robustness was assessed in an independent ROS/MAP cohort (n=327) using a two-round nested classification strategy. ResultsSubgroup identification based on DAD-MUG-derived expression scores resulted in five molecular subgroups exhibiting significant differences in cognitive performance and core neuropathological measures. Cross-validated nested classification using transcriptomic and proteomic data demonstrated reliable discrimination of subgroups. Applying these classifiers to the replication cohort, subgroup-trait association patterns showed strong agreement with discovery findings (Spearman {rho} = 0.65). Differential expression analysis further revealed stage-dependent biological patterns of brain pathologies, ranging from early synaptic and immune activation to mitochondrial bioenergetic dysfunction at disease transition and proteostatic impairment in advanced stages. ConclusionUsing a balanced, network-informed multi-omics integration framework, we identified five molecular subgroups of brain aging, including a reference control subgroup and a distinct mixed subgroup characterized by amyloid, vascular pathology, and early-life adversity. Three additional subgroups formed a structured spectrum comprising molecularly Alzheimers-like but cognitively and neuropathologically unimpaired At-risk controls, an intermediate stage, and typical Alzheimers disease, with tau pathology differentiating advanced disease, underscoring the value of molecular subgroup identification beyond clinical diagnosis.