Trends in Healthcare Costs among People Living with HIV in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2018: Results from a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Xi, M.; Dumicho, A. Y.; Tan, D. H. S.; Masucci, L.; Burchell, A. N.; Zwerling, A.; Ma, H.; Zhang, W.; OHTN Cohort Study Team, ; Mishra, S.; Thavorn, K.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo quantify trends in annual mean healthcare costs per person living with HIV from 2003 to 2018 from a publicly funded healthcare system perspective. DesignWe conducted a retrospective population-based study using administrative health data in Ontario, Canada, including 25,842 people living with HIV diagnosed and entering care between 1992 and 2018. A nested cohort from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (n=3,516) provided additional HIV-related characteristics. MethodsAnnual mean healthcare costs per person were estimated using a validated costing algorithm and inflated to 2025 Canadian dollars. Trends were examined overall and stratified by sociodemographic factors (age, sex, rurality, neighbourhood income, immigration status) and year of entry into HIV care. Within the nested cohort, trends were stratified by nadir CD4 count and any antiretroviral therapy use since diagnosis. ResultsAnnual mean cost per person increased from $11,963 in 2003 to $16,721 in 2018. Medication costs remained the largest cost component throughout (47.4-61.7%) and closely mirrored overall trends. Higher annual mean costs were consistently observed among individuals diagnosed at older ages, lower-income neighbourhood residents, long-term Ontario residents (Canadian-born or immigrated before 1985), and individuals with nadir CD4<200cells/{micro}L. ConclusionMedication expenditures continue to drive healthcare costs for people living with HIV. Cost containing strategies, including expanded generic substitution and strengthened price negotiation, may reduce costs without compromising outcomes. Persistent cost disparities highlight the need to address delayed treatment initiation and broader social determinants shaping HIV treatment access and sustained engagement in care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Field performance and cost-effectiveness of a point-of-care triage test for HIV virological failure in Southern Africa 93%
- Clinical outcomes after extended 12-month antiretroviral therapy prescriptions in a community-based differentiated HIV service delivery programme in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study 92%
- Preventing tuberculosis with community-based care in an HIV-endemic setting: a modeling analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between virtual visits and health outcomes of people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study 95%
- Socioeconomic determinants of virtual care use among people living with HIV in a clinical cohort in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study 93%
- Impact Of The COVID-19 Pandemic On Routine HIV Care And Antiretroviral Treatment Outcomes In Kenya: A Nationally Representative Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical outcomes after viraemia among people receiving dolutegravir versus efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy in South Africa 92%
- Predictors of Clinical Outcomes among People with HIV and Tuberculosis Symptoms after Rapid Treatment Initiation in Haiti 91%
- Determining population-level allocation strategies for COVID-19 treatments in the United States using a quantitative framework, a case study using nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differentiated HIV Service Delivery vs Conventional Care: Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy Outcomes for People Living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa 91%
- Assisted partner services for people who inject drugs: Index characteristics associated with untreated HIV in partners 91%
- Maternal HIV retesting during pregnancy and postpartum among high-risk populations in Kenya, South Africa, and Ukraine: Cost-effectiveness of preventing vertical transmission 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.