Back

Substantial genomic and methylation variability between MCF-7 sublines

Atanda, H. C.; Ewing, A. D.

2026-02-19 genomics
10.64898/2026.02.17.706500 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cell lines have long been used as in vitro models for molecular assays in diagnostic and therapeutic development due to their accessibility as a well-controlled system. MCF-7 cell lines are the most widely studied cell lines in human breast cancer research, and its sublines have been reported to exhibit clonal, cytogenetic, and transcriptomic variability. However, allele-specific methylation alterations in cancer genomes remain inadequately explored, largely due to limitations in sequencing methods. Here, we applied nanopore sequencing technology to characterise the genomic and epigenomic landscapes of two MCF-7 sublines. We identified global and local DNA methylation differences as well as structural variants (SVs), and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) between and within the sublines. Our analysis revealed substantial divergence in methylation patterns between the sublines, with [~]3% of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) overlapping with known cancer driver genes. These DMRs overlap breast cancer-associated genes, including ERBB2, CDH1, SALL4, GATA2, GATA3, HMGA2, and FBLN2. We find that the majority of differentially methylated sites are explained by differential allelic methylation, and that allele-specific DMRs often overlap points where antisense non-coding RNAs overlap protein-coding genes. Transposable elements in both sublines also showed distinct methylation profiles, with one subline having hypomethylated L1 elements compared to the other, which correlated with the amount of apparent insertional mutagenesis attributable to L1 between the sublines. Our study demonstrates the utility of nanopore sequencing in providing novel insights into genomic and methylomic differences within cell lines, in addition to insight into the nature of differential allelic methylation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
3
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
5
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
10
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
12
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
17
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
22
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
29
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%