Fleeing is Believing: Adaptive behavior under social threat as an inference process
Khurana, H. S.; Mussetto, V.; Gross, C. T.; Bufacchi, R. J.
Show abstract
1.Adverse social experiences profoundly alter animal behavior, yet the processes underlying context-appropriate behavior selection based on prior social interactions remain poorly understood. Existing models capture statistical patterns but are not framed in mechanistic frameworks that explain individual variability and predict behavioral outcomes. We address this gap by modeling social defeat in mice as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), implementing a heterarchical agent architecture - a structured network of interacting modules balancing exploration and exploitation. Our model successfully reconstructs observed behavioral motifs (e.g., investigation, hesitation, and flights), fits different mouse phenotypes (e.g., susceptible vs. resilient), and mechanistically captures the impact of social defeat as a parameter shift in the animals internal generative model. The model reproduces effects of interventions like optogenetic stimulation, and generates testable predictions for future experiments. The models modular architecture enables natural extension to other behavioral domains including foraging and multi-agent interactions, representing a foundational step toward interpretable models of mouse behavior. By capturing how adverse social experiences reshape decision-making at the computational level, this work offers potential clinical relevance for trauma and anxiety disorders in humans.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Opponent processes in visual memories: a model of attraction and repulsion in navigating insects' mushroom bodies. 96%
- The successor representation subserves hierarchical abstraction for goal-directed behavior 96%
- Contextual inference through flexible integration of environmental features and behavioural outcomes 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.