Back

High-Performance, Computer-Controlled Bipedal DNA Motor

Basak, S.; Berger, Y.; Perel, O.; Shapira, H.; Tomov, T. E.; Sheheade, B.; Tsukanov, R.; Uralevitch, M.; Nir, E.

2026-02-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.17.706383 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Achieving precise, repeatable motion at the molecular scale remains a central challenge in the development of synthetic molecular machines. Here we report a high-fidelity, fast bipedal DNA walker that moves bidirectionally along a DNA origami track using a fuel-before-antifuel operational scheme that suppresses trap states typical of externally powered DNA motors. Automated, computer-controlled microfluidics enables programmable trajectory execution with >98% yield per step and sustained bidirectional walking over distances of up to 360 nm, as monitored by single-molecule FRET. Kinetic analysis reveals rapid leg lifting but slower leg placement due to inhibitory fuel-antifuel heterocomplex formation, identifying a mechanistic bottleneck that can be mitigated through optimization of fuel, antifuel and foothold design. The resulting motor operates with efficiencies of up to 4 orders of magnitude higher than previous externally controlled DNA walkers, establishing a robust framework for deterministic, programmable molecular transport.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.7%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
● 217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
ChemBioChem
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Nature Chemistry
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
ACS Central Science
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.2%
11
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
● 167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
Chemical Science
● 73 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
15
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
17
Langmuir
● 36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
19
Biochemistry
● 148 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
21
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Protein Science
○ 246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
ACS Sensors
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Lab on a Chip
● 96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
25
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
26
Biophysical Reports
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
27
Soft Matter
● 60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Chemical Communications
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Small Methods
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.