Back

High-throughput targeted paleoproteomics sex estimation on medieval Great Moravia individuals using MALDI-CASI-FTICR mass spectrometry

Bray, F.; Pilmann Koterova, A.; Garbe, L.; Haegelin, M.; Bertrand, B.; Agossa, K.; Rolando, C.; Veleminsky, P.; Bruzek, J.; Morvan, M.

2026-02-18 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.17.706309 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The estimation of the biological sex of archeological remains is crucial information in bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. In recent years, proteomics based on molecular sexual dimorphism have emerged as a preferred method, particularly because of its minimally-invasive approach to extracting amelogenin X and Y proteins from tooth enamel. However, there is an increasing demand to accelerate this process while facilitating the analysis of large archaeological assemblages. This study presents a novel high-throughput targeted paleoproteomics method for biological sex estimation using MALDI-CASI-FTICR mass spectrometry. This approach combines the strengths of existing methods, including ultra-high resolution, significantly reduced processing times, targeted analysis, and scalability to large archaeological sample sets. The method was initially validated on modern individuals with known sex and subsequently applied to 130 adult and juvenile individuals from medieval Great Moravia (present-day Czech Republic). Biological sex was successfully estimated for all but one of the individuals. The results not only provide a more efficient biological sex estimation but also help to resolve a few errors in sex assessment previously encountered with osteomorphological and tooth morphometric techniques. The implementation of this method significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of biological sex estimation, offering a powerful tool for anthropological research. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/706309v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ede7e6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13d2f5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17ee44dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1be9dd9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
4
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
7
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
8
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
19
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
28
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
29
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%