Back

A Hybrid PINN-DE Framework for Data-Driven Parameter Estimation of Tumor-Immune Dynamics in Bladder Cancer

Mastroberardino, A.; Glick, A. E.

2026-02-18 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.17.706276 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bladder cancer presents significant clinical challenges due to its complex immune microenvironment and highly heterogeneous response to treatments. To create accurate, individualized models of disease progression, we first construct a system of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) that captures tumor-immune interactions. We address the challenge of estimating unknown parameters by performing a rigorous comparative analysis of two heuristic optimization methods: Differential Evolution (DE), a robust global optimization algorithm, and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN), a novel machine learning framework that embeds ODE constraints into its loss function. Our findings provide a critical evaluation of the computational efficiency and accuracy of each method for parameterizing biological ODE systems. This study validates the power of hybrid machine learning approaches in mathematical oncology, yielding a data-driven model of bladder cancer progression with direct potential for optimizing personalized treatment strategies. Author summaryBladder cancer remains a major global health threat, characterized by highly unpredictable responses to treatment and a high likelihood of recurrence. To better predict how a patients disease will progress, researchers use mathematical models that simulate the "war" between cancer cells and the immune system. However, these models are only useful if they can be accurately tuned to a specific patients data--a process called parameter estimation. This task is notoriously difficult because clinical data is often sparse and noisy, making it hard to find the right settings for the model. In this study, we developed a novel computational framework that combines a traditional "survival of the fittest" optimization algorithm (Differential Evolution) with Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), a specialized architecture designed to embed physical constraints directly into the learning process. By "teaching" the AI the underlying biological laws of cancer growth, our hybrid approach can accurately estimate a patients unique disease parameters even when raw data is limited. We validated this method using a "virtual patient" system derived from real-world clinical trials. Our results show that this hybrid approach provides a more robust and reliable way to personalize cancer models, offering a powerful new tool for doctors to simulate and optimize individual treatment plans before they are even administered.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
19.4%
3
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
8
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
12
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
15
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
22
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
27
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%