Back

All text: A Novel Scoring System for Precise Severity Quantification in Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome: Development and Application Based on Dynamic Clinical Data

Sun, Y.; Pan, Z.; Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, W.; Liang, M.; Zhang, A.; Wu, Q.; Sheng, H.; Yang, J.

2026-02-18 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.17.26346452 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSevere Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) is an acute infectious disease with high mortality. This study aimed to develop a quantitative scoring system for grading SFTS severity using dynamic clinical data. MethodsA retrospective study included 547 confirmed SFTS patients from two hospitals. Clinical data were collected over a 14-day course (divided into four phases). Patients were grouped into survivors (n=451) and non-survivors (n=96). Statistical analyses, including Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, were performed. An external validation cohort of 44 new patients was used to validate the scoring system via C-statistic, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). ResultsOf 547 patients, 96 (17.55%) were non-survivors. Multivariate logistic regression identified six independent prognostic factors across phases: age, platelet (PLT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine (Cr) (days 5-7); age, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), Cr, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (days 8-10); Cr and LDH (days 11-14). A scoring system (0-11 points) was developed, stratifying patients into low (0-3), intermediate (4-7), and high (8-11) risk groups, with adverse outcome rates of 1.04%, 22.92%, and 76.04%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant prognostic differences (log-rank P<0.001). External validation (44 cases) confirmed excellent performance: AUC 0.810-0.952, good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P>0.05), and net clinical benefit (DCA Eavg 0.068-0.098, Emax 0.422-0.559). ConclusionA dynamic SFTS severity scoring system was developed and validated. Internal and external validation confirmed its reliability and clinical utility, providing a simple, practical tool for timely assessment and early intervention.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%