Cost-effectiveness of High-Dose Influenza Vaccination in the Netherlands: Updated Analysis Incorporating New Evidence
van der Pol, S.; Emamipour, S.; van Oudheusden, A.; Slierendregt, B.; Moncayo, G.; Boersma, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundHigh-dose inactivated influenza vaccination (HD-IIV) demonstrates superior effectiveness versus standard-dose vaccination (SD-IIV) in adults aged [≥]60 years. A recent meta-analysis integrated complementary evidence sources of representing over 85 million individuals across 14 influenza seasons. MethodsA previously developed model was updated using life-time horizon and societal perspective. Updated parameters included demographics, costs, hospitalization rates, and relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE): RCT evidence (24% for ILI, 7% for cardiorespiratory hospitalizations) and RCT + real-world evidence (RWE) (15% for ILI, 8% for cardiorespiratory hospitalizations). ResultsHD-IIV resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of {euro}7,300/QALY (RCT evidence) and {euro}5,800/QALY (RCT+RWE evidence). Implementation would prevent 7,200 general practitioner visits, 6,300 cardiorespiratory hospitalizations, and 269 deaths, by using RCT evidence. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated >99% probability of cost-effectiveness at {euro}20,000/QALY threshold for both RCT and RCT+RWE evidence. ConclusionsHD-IIV remains highly cost-effective for Dutch adults aged [≥]60 years under updated evidence scenarios, supporting implementation in the national immunization programme. HighlightsO_LIThe economic analysis of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine was updated. C_LIO_LIRelative vaccine effectiveness of HD-IIV incorporating recent evidence was used. C_LIO_LIHD-IIV remains cost-effective in Dutch adults aged [≥]60. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Number of COVID-19 hospitalisations averted by vaccination: Estimates for the Netherlands, January 6, 2021 through August 30, 2022 94%
- What is the quality of evidence informing vaccine clinical practice recommendations in Australia? 94%
- Impact of CoronaVac on Covid-19 outcomes of elderly adults in a large and socially unequal Brazilian city: A target trial emulation study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines for the Portuguese elderly population 96%
- Potential public health and economic impact of the next-generation COVID-19 vaccine mRNA-1283 in the Netherlands 95%
- Effectiveness of vaccination against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: A multi-country analysis 95%
- Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review 94%
- Vaccine Effectiveness against Referral to Hospital and Severe Lung Injury Associated with COVID-19: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in St. Petersburg, Russia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against laboratory confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths, among individuals aged 65 years or more in Portugal: a cohort study based on data-linkage of national registries February-September 2021 94%
- Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 hospitalization among Finnish elderly and chronically ill – An interim analysis of a nationwide cohort study 93%
- Is the BioNTech-Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination effective in elderly populations? Results from population data from Bavaria, Germany 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of the updated COVID-19 mRNA Autumn 2023 vaccines in Germany 96%
- Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the COVID-19 mRNA-1273 vaccine in the United States 93%
- Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the Next-Generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 Vaccine in the United States 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.