Back

Informal support networks and their role in community safety and mental well-being among racially and ethnically minoritised groups in London: a qualitative study

Benjamin, L.; Williams, D.; Asif, Z.; Campbell, S.; Mousicos, D.; Rhead, R.; Stanley, N.; Kienzler, H.; Hatch, S.

2026-02-23 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.17.26346389 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCommunity safety is a key determinant of mental well-being, yet racially and ethnically minoritised communities in the UK often face higher exposure to violence alongside barriers to formal protection and support. In these contexts, informal support networks may play a critical role in shaping how safety is experienced and how distress is managed. Although such networks are widely recognised as protective for mental well-being, there is limited qualitative research examining how they operate in relation to community safety in settings shaped by structural inequality. This study explores how informal support networks influence experiences of community safety and mental well-being among racially and ethnically minoritised groups in South East London. MethodsThis qualitative study draws on semi-structured interviews (n = 31) with racially and ethnically minoritised participants aged 16+ living or working in Lambeth and Southwark [South East London]. Using a co-produced qualitative design, community consultations informed the development of interview topics. Interviews explored informal support networks, experiences of community safety and their intersections with mental well-being. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) experiences of community safety and their mental health impacts; (2) gendered experiences of safety and responsibility; (3) formal support and its barriers; and (4) community and peer-led initiatives as a response to institutional distrust. ConclusionInformal support networks are central to everyday safety and emotional well-being, yet they cannot substitute for adequately resourced, culturally informed public provisions. Strengthening public infrastructure must involve meaningful collaboration with trusted community networks and address the intersectional needs of racially and ethnically minoritised groups.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
3
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
9
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%