Back

Integrated monogenic and polygenic risk predicts disease progression in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy

Liu, S.; Szabo, A.; Zarouchlioti, C.; Bhattacharyya, N.; Nguyen, Q.; Abreu Costa, M.; Luben, R.; Dudakova, L.; Skalicka, P.; Horak, M.; Khawaja, A.; Pontikos, N.; Muthusamy, K.; Tuft, S.; Liskova, P.; Davidson, A.

2026-02-18 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.02.17.26346339 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is a common corneal disease and a leading indication for endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Although CTG18.1 repeat expansion is a major genetic risk factor, the contribution of polygenic background to disease progression remains unclear. We evaluated whether combining CTG18.1 expansion status with a FECD-specific polygenic risk score (PRS) enables genomic prediction of progression to EK. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 589 individuals with FECD from two European centers, with replication in an independent cohort of 185 individuals. Association of CTG18.1 expansion ([&ge;]50 repeats) and PRS with time to EK were evaluated using Cox models adjusted for sex and ancestry. ResultsExpansion-positive status was associated with earlier EK (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.62- 3.26; P<.001). Addition of PRS improved prediction (C-index 0.614 vs 0.602; P=.014). Each 1-SD increase in PRS was associated with earlier EK (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.30; P=.015), with replication in the validation cohort (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.75; P=.001). ConclusionIntegration of monogenic and polygenic risk enables genomic prediction of FECD progression, supporting clinical genomic risk stratification to inform individualized monitoring and timing of intervention.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
2
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
21
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%