Back

Chemical interactions in polyethylene glycol-induced condensates lead to an anomalous FRET response from a flexible linker-fluorescent protein crowding sensor

Mohapatra, A.; Antarasen, J.; Latham, D. R.; Barilla, M. A.; Davis, C. M.; Kisley, L.

2026-02-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.16.706251 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The cellular cytosol is a crowded environment. Biomolecular Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) sensors have been developed to measure crowding in cytosol mimics comprised of synthetic polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and Ficoll that impart an excluded volume effect. In the current study, we explore the unsolicited role of PEG in driving the phase separation of a protein crowding sensor, AcGFP1/mCherry-FRET crowding helix 2 (CrH2), into fluorescent puncta. In contrast, a DNA-based crowding sensor (CrD), with an Alexa488/Cy5 FRET pair, does not form puncta under the same crowding conditions. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching imaging, we uncover the liquid-like physical properties of the PEG-induced puncta. Two-color fluorescence microscopy imaging reveals crowder-induced inhomogeneity, concentration variations, and partition coefficient across the dilute and dense phases of the liquid puncta, which remain largely underexplored in bulk fluorometry measurements. Thus, the average crowding sensor response may originate from an aqueous biphasic system, reporting an erroneous average response instead of distinct levels of crowdedness. A comparison of excluded volume effects conferred by Ficoll and PEGs of various molecular weight ranges shows the influence of size, concentration, excluded volume, and chemical composition on the CrH2 sensor response. We demonstrate that PEGs enable phase separation and alter sensor response through a mechanism that may be driven by polymer interactions with the flexible hinge region of CrH2. Overall, we determine the biophysical mechanisms underlying PEG-induced condensation of CrH2 and demonstrate a CrD sensor as an alternative that does not undergo phase separation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.1%
2
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.2%
4
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.0%
13
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
15
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
16
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
17
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
18
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
19
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
22
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
24
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
25
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
27
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
28
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
29
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
30
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%