Back

Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Guided Modeling with AlphaFold and Rosetta Improves Protein Complex Structure Prediction

Narayanasamy, A.; Drake, Z. C.; Turzo, S. M. B. A.; Rolland, A. D.; Prell, J. S.; Wysocki, V. H.; Lindert, S.

2026-02-16 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.16.706193 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) provides valuable structural information about protein shape and size through collision cross section (CCS). However, it lacks atomic level structural detail. While AlphaFold has been successful in predicting monomeric protein structure, it can struggle with modeling protein complexes. To address these limitations, we developed a method that integrates IM-MS data with AlphaFold and Rosetta to improve complex structure prediction. Our approach uses experimental CCS data to guide the assembly of AlphaFold predicted subunits using a Rosetta docking pipeline and evaluating the resulting complexes with a newly developed score. Using this strategy, we were able to improve root mean square deviation (RMSD) values for 26 of 38 (68%) complexes compared to AlphaFold-Multimer. Furthermore, 16 of these systems improved significantly from greater than 4 [A] RMSD to less than 4 [A]. This method demonstrates a robust approach to overcome limitations in complex assembly modeling. Table of Contents Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=182 SRC="FIGDIR/small/706193v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (68K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cf71c3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135e09aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2cc2fcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b53feb_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG In this integrative modeling work, protein complex structures were modeled by combining AlphaFold predicted subunits with Rosetta docking. Collision cross section data from ion-mobility mass spectrometry were used as evaluation constraints and docked models were scored using the IM-complex score. The best scoring models generally represent accurate protein complex structures. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
2
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
14
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
22
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
24
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
30
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%