Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Guided Modeling with AlphaFold and Rosetta Improves Protein Complex Structure Prediction
Narayanasamy, A.; Drake, Z. C.; Turzo, S. M. B. A.; Rolland, A. D.; Prell, J. S.; Wysocki, V. H.; Lindert, S.
Show abstract
Ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) provides valuable structural information about protein shape and size through collision cross section (CCS). However, it lacks atomic level structural detail. While AlphaFold has been successful in predicting monomeric protein structure, it can struggle with modeling protein complexes. To address these limitations, we developed a method that integrates IM-MS data with AlphaFold and Rosetta to improve complex structure prediction. Our approach uses experimental CCS data to guide the assembly of AlphaFold predicted subunits using a Rosetta docking pipeline and evaluating the resulting complexes with a newly developed score. Using this strategy, we were able to improve root mean square deviation (RMSD) values for 26 of 38 (68%) complexes compared to AlphaFold-Multimer. Furthermore, 16 of these systems improved significantly from greater than 4 [A] RMSD to less than 4 [A]. This method demonstrates a robust approach to overcome limitations in complex assembly modeling. Table of Contents Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=182 SRC="FIGDIR/small/706193v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (68K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cf71c3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135e09aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2cc2fcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b53feb_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG In this integrative modeling work, protein complex structures were modeled by combining AlphaFold predicted subunits with Rosetta docking. Collision cross section data from ion-mobility mass spectrometry were used as evaluation constraints and docked models were scored using the IM-complex score. The best scoring models generally represent accurate protein complex structures. C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.