Back

A scalable approach to inoculate plant viral vectors into plant tissue using non-pathogenic, transgenic galls

DeBlasio, S. L.; Gao, F.; Pang, Z.; Igwe, D. O.; Sullivan, S.; Wang, Y.-H.; Pitino, M.; Coradetti, S.; Simon, A.; Heck, M. L.

2026-02-18 plant biology
10.64898/2026.02.16.706162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vascular plant pathogens transmitted by insects inflict devastating economic losses on crops worldwide. By obstructing and usurping the natural flow of nutrients, plant infection by these pathogens drastically reduces yields, vigor and productivity. Treating fruit-bearing trees against persistent vascular pathogens poses a unique challenge, as systemic delivery of therapeutics must navigate the compartmentalized architecture of the trees vascular system under changing environmental conditions without disrupting fruit production or long-term tree health. Plant viruses have gained traction as a novel approach to deliver therapies to crop plants, including fruit trees, but delivery of viral vectors to orchards at scale remains a significant challenge. We tested whether transgenic galls can be used to systemically infect plants with a plant virus infectious clone. We combined the plant growth regulator gene cassette from Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58 with the wild-type strain of citrus yellow vein associated virus-1 (CY1) on a single plasmid within the T-DNA for plant cell transformation. Using EHA105, a disarmed strain of A. tumefaciens, we inoculated stems with these gall-forming plasmids and initiated systemic CY1 infection in citrus and Arabidopsis thaliana over three independent experiments. We provide proof-of-concept that transgenic galls, referred to as symbionts, can launch the systemic infection of CY1 in economically important and model plants. Symbiont delivery of therapeutic viral vectors is theoretically scalable from inoculation of mother trees within the nursery to millions of trees in the field and may be a valuable tool for the commercial delivery of therapeutic plant viral vectors.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%