Back

Below-ground ants follow pheromones more quickly under dark conditions, but pheromones do not affect decision accuracy nor aggression

Krapf, P.; Mitschke, M.; Voellenklee, N.; Lenninger, A.; Czaczkes, T. J.; Schlick-Steiner, B. C.; Steiner, F. M.

2026-02-17 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.16.706118 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Communication allows organisms to quickly convey information vital for survival or fitness. Chemical communication and speed-accuracy trade-offs are ubiquitous in animal decision making. Most studies have used species which forage mainly above-ground species, tested in an epigean setting, but it remains unclear whether below-ground species behave similarly. Here, we use the below-ground ant Tetramorium alpestre to assess the efficacy of above- vs. below-ground mazes, the accuracy of decisions when using natural vs. artificial pheromones, the presence of a speed-accuracy trade-off, and the pheromones effect on aggression. Ants decided more quickly under below-ground than above-ground conditions, indicating they may be distracted by above-ground stimuli. Ants followed both natural and artificial trails but in direct competition preferred artificial trails, likely due to a higher pheromone concentration. Surprisingly, no speed-accuracy trade off was observed during path decision-making. Lastly, population origin but not pheromones affected if and how aggression occurred in presence of trail and home-range marking pheromones. We argue that the design of behavioural tests should match the lifestyle of the focal organism. We further speculate that speed-accuracy trade-offs likely are highly species- and context-specific and other factors besides chemicals seem important to trigger aggression, at least in this species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.4%
2
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
3
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%