Back

How the brain represents a romantic partner: dissociable roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula

Fujisaki, K.; Ueda, R.; Nakai, R.; Abe, N.

2026-03-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.16.706085 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans form selective and enduring pair bonds with romantic partners, a principal feature of human sociality. Neuroimaging studies have shown that romantic partners are differentially represented from other individuals in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and anterior insula (aINS), and that the specificity of partner representations in the NAcc diminishes as relationships mature. However, it remains unclear whether such differentiation reflects partner-specific coding or mere differences in familiarity with others, and whether these regions play different roles in romantic bonding. To address these questions, we applied multiple regression representational similarity analysis to fMRI data from 51 heterosexual male participants in early romantic relationships. The data were acquired during a social incentive delay task, in which participants anticipated social approval from their female romantic partner, a female friend, or an unfamiliar female individual. This approach allowed us to dissociate partner-specific representations from familiarity-related effects in the NAcc and aINS. We found that both regions exhibited partner-specific representations that could not be explained by familiarity. Consistent with previous findings, partner specificity in the NAcc was negatively associated with relationship duration, indicating that partner-specific coding in this region is established early in romantic relationships and diminishes as relationships progress. Moreover, greater partner specificity in the aINS was associated with more frequent intrusive thoughts about the partner. Together, these findings demonstrate that romantic partners are represented in the NAcc and aINS in a qualitatively distinct manner from other individuals, and that these regions support dissociable aspects of romantic bonding. Key PointsO_LIMultiple regression representational similarity analysis revealed partner-specific representations in the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula that cannot be explained by familiarity. C_LIO_LIIndividuals in longer relationships showed reduced partner specificity in the nucleus accumbens, consistent with prior findings. C_LIO_LIIndividuals exhibiting greater partner specificity in the anterior insula reported more frequent intrusive thoughts about their partner, indicating dissociable psychological functions across regions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
4
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
12
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%