Back

A visualization framework for cell division activity and orientation in pre-anthesis ovaries of Prunus species

Shimbo, A.; Nishiyama, S.; Katsuno, T.; Kusumi, A.; Yamane, H.; Kanaoka, M. M.; Tao, R.

2026-02-18 plant biology
10.64898/2026.02.16.706041 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fruit size and shape, which influence horticultural quality, are determined by the number and the size of the cells in the local region. In fruit trees, however, the difficulty of applying molecular genetic approaches has hindered a detailed understanding of the localization and orientation of cell division in developing fruit tissues. In this study, we established a novel framework to visualize cell division in pre-anthesis ovaries of three drupe crops, peach (Prunus persica), Japanese apricot (P. mume) and the interspecific hybrid Japanese apricot (P. salicina x P. mume), providing clear insight into the spatial distribution and orientation of dividing cells. We systematically optimized a 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) labeling protocol for thick ovary tissues by adjusting infiltration conditions and fixation methods. In addition, electron microscopy combined with wide-view tiling visualization was applied to directly identify dividing cells, including those undergoing chromosome segregation and cell plate formation. By combining with machine learning-based detection, we efficiently and objectively identified dividing cells. Using these complementary approaches, we found that cell division activity was broadly distributed throughout pre-anthesis ovaries in all three crops, without pronounced spatial restriction. In contrast, analysis of division orientation revealed region-specific patterns: cells in the outermost exocarp divided predominantly anticlinally, whereas cells in the mesocarp divided largely periclinally, consistent with subsequent ovary (fruit) enlargement. The integrated framework presented here provides a foundation for understanding the spatial and three-dimensional regulation of fruit development and for future studies in fruit morphogenesis and horticulture.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
9
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
10
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
12
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
14
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
15
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
24
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%