Back

Multi-Omic Analyses of Dietary Fatty Acid-Microbe-Host Interactions Reveal Metaorganismal Lipid Metabolic Crosstalk Impacting Cardiometabolic Disease

Mouannes, N.; Burrows, A. C.; Horak, A. J.; Venkateshwari, V.; Dutta, S.; Mahen, K.; Banerjee, R.; Massey, W. J.; Ye, X.; Mrdjen, M.; Brown, A. L.; Awoniyi, M.; Kitao, K.; Sandhu, A.; Tomimoto, C.; Tsuji, K.; Yonejima, Y.; Ampong, I.; Zhang, R.; Qiu, Y.; Willard, B.; Hajjar, A. M.; Dwidar, M.; Sangwan, N.; Walker, M. E.; Spite, M.; Cheng, F.; Brown, J. M.

2026-02-18 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.16.705588 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Following a meal, our gut microbiome and human cells collaborate via metaorganismal metabolic circuits to produce diverse nutrient metabolites that systemically circulate to influence health and disease. Although there are now several examples of bacterial fiber-, amino acid-, and micronutrient-derived metabolites impacting cardiometabolic disease, very little is known in regards to how diet-microbe-host interactions impact lipid homeostasis. Here we address this by defining dietary fatty acid substrate availability in germ-free versus conventionally-raised mice coupled to deep multi-omic metabolic phenotyping. Our data demonstrate that the effects of dietary saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) on the host lipidome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome are uniquely impacted by resident microbiota. Also, the hepatic levels of both pro-inflammatory and pro-resolving lipid mediators are strongly influenced by dietary fatty acid-microbe interactions. This study presents a unique resource to the nutrition and metabolism research community to advance our understanding of metaorganismal lipid metabolism. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=104 SRC="FIGDIR/small/705588v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (50K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4fc7e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc1dc8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b7648dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12a8088_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGRAPHICAL ABSTRACTC_FLOATNO C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.0%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.0%
3
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
5
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
7
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
9
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.3%
11
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
17
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
24
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
25
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%