Back

If you give a mouse a poopsicle: a novel fecal microbiota transplant method for exploring the role of the gut microbiome in stress-related outcomes in mice

Tschang, M. A.; Deo-Campo Vuong, R.; Eilers, B.; Chac, D.; Waalkes, A.; Penewit, K.; Easton, A.; Schuessler, B.; Daniels, R. M.; Weil, A. A.; Salipante, S. J.; Gibbons, S. M.; Schindler, A. G.

2026-02-16 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.16.705192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The microbiome-gut-brain axis is a mediator of stress-related disorders. The number of preclinical studies exploring the potential causal mechanism of this connection using fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is growing. However, the most common method for delivering fecal transplants in rodent models is still oral gavage, which creates an adverse experience that may confound stress-related outcomes. Here, we establish an alternative methodology for FMT that decreases stress induced by traditional experimental procedures. We first used preference and anxiety behavior assays to identify antibiotic therapies having maximal tolerability and minimal anxiolytic properties. We then collected feces from donor mice and homogenized them with a microbe-stabilizing buffer to create a slurry, which was frozen into pellets ("poopsicles") for subsequent FMT. Recipient mice voluntarily consumed the pellets, and blood was collected to compare corticosterone levels relative to traditional gavage FMT. Plasma corticosterone levels were found to be significantly lower in mice receiving FMT via pellets compared to oral gavage. Furthermore, relative to gavage FMT, microbial signatures of mice receiving FMT via pellets were more similar to those of the donor pellets at one week following final FMT and were sustained for up to six weeks, as assessed by comparing Bray-Curtis beta-diversity distances. Together, these results establish effective antibiotic and FMT methods that minimize treatment-induced stress, while effectively transplanting fecal microbes between murine conspecifics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.8%
5
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
17
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
21
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
26
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%