Back

Antibody Responses Against Coronaviruses in the Wuhan Population

Zhou, S.; Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Cai, K.; Lan, K.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, L.

2026-02-17 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.15.705976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prolonged circulation of SARS-CoV-2 may broaden population-level neutralizing antibody responses to diverse coronaviruses; however, the extent of this breadth remains unclear. To address this gap, we assessed serum neutralizing activity in 869 individuals from Wuhan, China, including 78 pre-pandemic samples collected in 2017 and 791 post-pandemic samples obtained in 2025. Specifically, using pseudovirus neutralization assays, sera were tested against a panel of coronaviruses, including circulating SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants XFG and NB.1.8.1. Neutralization was measured at a fixed dilution for all samples and by determination of 50% inhibitory dilution (ID50) for selected sera. In parallel, antigenic cartography and genetic distance analyses were applied to relate functional antigenic relationships to spike protein divergence. Our results showed that, compared with pre-pandemic sera, post-pandemic sera exhibited enhanced neutralizing activity against multiple sarbecoviruses and the merbecovirus MjHKU4r-CoV-1, with mean inhibition increases ranging from 1.7% to 76.5% at a 1:20 dilution. Notably, the largest increases from 51.8% to 76.5% were observed against clade 1b sarbecoviruses. In contrast, neutralizing activity against human alphacoronaviruses and MERS-CoV showed no meaningful enhancement. Moreover, neutralizing titers in post-pandemic sera were strongly correlated across sarbecoviruses, particularly among clade 1b viruses. Antigenic mapping further revealed that several zoonotic sarbecoviruses were antigenically closer to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 than contemporary Omicron subvariants, despite substantially greater genetic divergence. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that cumulative SARS-CoV-2 exposure promotes broadly cross-neutralizing antibody responses within the sarbecovirus subgenus and provide a quantitative framework to inform the rational design of pan-sarbecovirus vaccines and antibody-based countermeasures for future coronavirus preparedness.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.4%
2
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
3
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
4
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
7
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
10
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
11
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
23
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
27
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%