Back

Psychological influences on hypertension in Southeastern Nigeria: a mixed-methods study protocol

Ebigwei Omeda, A. R.; Chilaka, M.; Mohammadnezhad, M.; Vaportzis, E.

2026-02-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.15.26346343 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe Southeastern region of Nigeria faces a severe public health challenge from hypertension due to its high prevalence. Psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, coping mechanisms, and social support play essential roles in hypertension development and treatment, yet there has been limited scholarly attention to these factors in Nigerian and international qualitative research. This study addresses this evidence gap by investigating the psychological factors that influence hypertension development in adults living in Southeastern Nigeria. Materials and methodsThe sequential explanatory mixed methods study includes validated psychometric instruments assessing perceived stress, anxiety, depression, coping mechanisms, and social support. Regression analyses, correlation tests, and mediation/moderation models will be used to examine relationships among these variables. The research team will collect qualitative data through semi-structured interviews accessible to participants either online or in person. Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarkes six-phase framework will be employed to explore participants lived experiences of stress, coping, and hypertension management. Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the University of Bradford Research Ethics Committee on 7th August 2025. The research follows all procedures based on the Declaration of Helsinki and institutional ethical guidelines. Findings will be disseminated at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals and stakeholder meetings held in both the UK and Nigeria. The research aims to generate evidence to support the development of comprehensive psychosocial care plans that address both physical and mental aspects of hypertension treatment in areas with limited resources.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
34.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.9%
3
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%