A Discrete Language of Protein Words for Functional Discovery and Design
Guo, Z.; Wang, Z.; Chai, Y.; XU, K.; Li, M.; Li, W.; Ou, G.
Show abstract
Proteins function through hierarchical modules, yet conventional models treat sequences as linear strings of residues, overlooking the recurrent multi-residue patterns--or "Protein Words"--that govern biological architecture. We introduce a physics-aware framework that discretizes protein space into a learnable vocabulary derived from the evolutionary record. By encoding proteins as sequences of discrete "words," our model captures higher-order structural and functional signals inaccessible to residue-level models, achieving highly competitive performance against widely established baselines in remote homology and mutation effect prediction. Analysis across 54 species reveals that these words track evolutionary complexity, specifically identifying the expansion of eukaryotic disordered regions. We demonstrate the discovery potential of this semantic axis by identifying ADMAP1 as a previously uncharacterized regulator of sperm motility, validated via CRISPR-Cas9 knockout mice. Finally, this vocabulary enables programmable design, generating functional cofilin variants despite high sequence divergence. This work establishes a linguistically inspired framework for deciphering the dark proteome and engineering biological function.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational design of nanoscale rotational mechanics in de novo protein assemblies 97%
- Evolutionary-Scale Enzymology Enables Biochemical Constant Prediction Across a Multi-Peaked Catalytic Landscape 97%
- OpenCell: proteome-scale endogenous tagging enables the cartography of human cellular organization 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.