Back

Put your money where your mouth is: Surveillance of antibiotic resistance within the commensal Neisseria

Regan, M. R.; McDevitt, C. J.; Robinson, L. R.; Issifou, S.; Wadsworth, C. B.

2026-02-15 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.14.705939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Commensal Neisseria species are major reservoirs of adaptive genetic variation, including antimicrobial resistance, for their pathogenic relatives, yet they remain poorly characterized. This gap limits our ability to anticipate resistance mechanisms that may ultimately emerge Neisseria gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis. Here, we analyzed 166 novel commensal Neisseria isolates collected from 31 study participants and measured minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for seven antimicrobials: azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and gentamicin. Resistance, defined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, was highly prevalent for azithromycin (76%) and doxycycline (52%), while no resistance to gentamicin was observed. High-level doxycycline resistance was always associated with inheritance of tetM. Reduced susceptibility to azithromycin was linked to an MtrD K823E substitution, and reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was associated with GyrA T91I (N. subflava) or S91V (N. mucosa). The PenA 312M mutation was associated with significantly elevated ceftriaxone and cefixime MICs. Across all antimicrobials, MICs varied widely, indicating the presence of additional modulating mutations. Finally, the genetic determinants underlying low-level doxycycline resistance and reduced penicillin susceptibility remain unresolved. Overall, here we continue to build on the foundation of surveillance efforts in the commensal Neisseria, and continue to flesh out what is known and unknown about this early warning system - or canary in the coal mine - for emerging resistance and clinically consequential evolution in pathogenic Neisseria.

Published in Microbiology Spectrum (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.