SMECT: a framework for benchmarking post-GWAS methods for spatial mapping of cells associated with human complex traits
Liu, M.; Xue, C.; Luo, Y.; Peng, W.; Ye, L.; Zhang, L.; Wei, W.; Li, M.
Show abstract
Spatially resolving the cellular basis of complex human traits is essential for elucidating disease mechanisms, yet the comparative performance of computational methods for this task has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we present SMECT (Spatial Mapping Evaluation of Complex Traits), the first comprehensive framework for systematically evaluating methods that integrate genetic data with spatial transcriptomics. SMECT combines a biologically realistic simulation engine, a curated resource of 21 diverse real-world datasets, and a multi-faceted assessment toolkit. Using this framework, we benchmarked three state-of-the-art methods--DESE, S-LDSC, and scDRS--across 19 complex traits. Our analysis reveals a fundamental trade-off between detection sensitivity and biological specificity. We demonstrate that while S-LDSC identifies extensive spatial signals, it suffers from inflated non-specific significant associations. Conversely, scDRS is highly specific but conservative, performing well only in tissues with strong biological signals while missing subtle associations in sparser datasets. DESE overcomes these limitations, consistently achieving high power and robust specificity across both simulated and real-world scenarios. SMECT provides critical guidelines for method selection and serves as a foundational resource for developing robust spatial analyses of human complex traits. The framework is publicly available at https://github.com/pmglab/smect.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MIRAGE: a Bayesian rare variant association analysis method incorporating functional information of variants 96%
- A Transcriptomic Atlas of the Human Brain Reveals Genetically Determined Aspects of Neuropsychiatric Health 96%
- Accounting for age-of-onset and family history improves power in genome-wide association studies 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.