Back

TriMouNet: An Algorithm for Inferring Level-1 Phylogenetic Networks from Multi-Locus Gene Tree Distributions.

Mao, Q.; Grünewald, S.

2026-02-17 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.14.705539 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the availability of full genomes of an ever-increasing number of species, many recent phylogenetic analyses have focused on datasets with thousands of loci. In the presence of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), many gene trees will be discordant with the species tree, which can then be estimated with a supertree method. In a separate stream of research, the reconstruction of phylogenetic networks, which aim to detect and visualize reticulations in addition to the dominant phylogenetic tree, has become common practice. Level-1 networks have the feature that every node can be interpreted as an ancestor of a subset of the taxa of interest and no two distinct cycles share a common node. TriLoNet is a method that constructs a level-1 network on all taxa from 3-taxa networks, so-called trinets. This approach is similar to modern supertree methods, but the trinets are assigned based on a single sequence alignment. Here we present TriMouNet (Trinet Multilocus Network), which uses the tree topology and branch length distribution in gene trees of a multilocus dataset to infer best-fitting trinets, together with scores quantifying their statistical support. These trinets are then puzzled together into a network on all taxa in a TriLoNet fashion. Experiments on simulated and real datasets show that TriMouNet can identify reticulations with low false positive rate, if the gene trees are accurate. On the other hand, TriLoNet applied to the concatenation of all loci, tends to predict wrong reticulations as the consequence of violations of model assumptions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
16.9%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
16.9%
3
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
5
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
9
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.2%
13
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
16
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
21
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%