Glutamate Dehydrogenase as a Superior Biomarker for Choledocholithiasis Risk Stratification
Sutter, J. P.; Kocheise, L.; Almadok, S.; Drews, J.; Stallbaum, F.; Kempski, J.; Ehlken, H.; Pinnschmidt, H.; Seungsu, M.; Schueckens, M.; Heide, G.; Adlung, L.; Schulze zur Wiesch, J.; Huber, S.; Lohse, A. W.
Show abstract
Background and AimsCholedocholithiasis (CDL) is a common condition that can lead to serious complications, requiring effective risk stratification for timely intervention. While current guidelines use clinical predictors, imaging, and laboratory markers for risk assessment, the role of glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) in CDL remains poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate its potential as a clinical biomarker for identifying patients with CDL. MethodsThis single-center cohort study identified 23,103 patients who presented to the emergency department of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and underwent routine abdominal laboratory testing between May 2021 and December 2023. Patients were classified into CDL and other diagnoses. To assess the predictive value of age, sex and laboratory markers for CDL, we developed a random forest machine learning model, conducted a backward stepwise logistic regression and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results152 patients were diagnosed with CDL and 22,951 with other diagnoses. In the random forest machine learning model, GLDH emerged as the most significant feature for predicting CDL. ROC analysis revealed that GLDH had the highest area under the curve of 0.93 among laboratory markers. At the upper limit of normal, GLDH demonstrated the best sensitivity (92%) compared to aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin. High GLDH levels exceeding 150 U/L demonstrate the highest specificity (99%) for CDL, outperforming AST, ALT and bilirubin. ConclusionGLDH outperforms AST, ALT and bilirubin as a screening and predictive marker for CDL, supporting its inclusion in clinical guidelines for risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the diagnostic tests for the detection of Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Factors influencing plasma galectin-3 concentrations in catheter-bearing hospitalized patients 91%
- Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as a prognostic biomarker for disease progression in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data 94%
- Prospective evaluation of transpancreatic sphincterotomy comparing to needle-knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation: short-and long-term outcomes 92%
- Linking Gene Expression to Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Using Machine Learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 92%
- Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing cirrhosis: A multicenter cohort study 91%
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- EGFR activation in cholangiocytes promotes extrahepatic bile duct regeneration after injury 94%
- Rbpj deletion in hepatic progenitor cells attenuates endothelial responses and fibrosis in DDC-fed mice 91%
- Hepatic MCPIP1 protein levels are reduced in NAFLD patients and are predominantly expressed in cholangiocytes and liver endothelium 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.