Back

At the Roots of Plant Awareness Disparity (PAD): Semantic processing and Numerosity Perception

Guerra, S.; Roccato, M.; Oletto, C. M.; Ghiani, A.; Bertamini, M.; Battaglini, L.

2026-02-17 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.13.705851 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant Awareness Disparity (PAD) refers to the inability of humans to notice plants and recognize their importance. Among the various factors (e.g., cultural) contributing to PAD, the less prominent visual cues of plants (e.g., color) might be one of the main features making them less noticeable to human perception. Here, we investigated whether PAD affects basic numerosity perception, which represents a fundamental cognitive ability that allows individuals to interpret and interact with their surroundings. Across three experiments, we compared how participants perceive the numerosity of plants (specifically trees), animals, and minerals. Participants completed two tasks: an estimation task, in which they reported the exact number of items in a single set and a comparison task, which required them to discriminate numerosity between two sets of items. In Experiment 1, both tasks employed colored images. We hypothesized that participants would underestimate the number of plant items in comparison to animals and minerals, given that plant stimuli typically attract less attention. In Experiment 2, black and white images were used to test whether the green color of plants contributes to PAD. In Experiment 3, all items were rotated of 180{degrees} to disrupt semantic recognition and assess whether PAD arises from higher-level cognitive processes. Results revealed a consistent underestimation of plants in Experiment 1 and 2, but this effect diminished in Experiment 3. The reduction of this effect suggests that semantic recognition processes may contribute to PAD. These results highlight how cognitive biases toward plants can influence basic perceptual judgments essential for everyday functioning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
10
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
11
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%