Back

Morphological innovation without gene co-option: the Drosophila sex comb evolved via changes in developmental tempo and energy metabolism

Hopkins, B. R.; Barmina, O.; Wang, X.; Situ, M. M.; Bolanos, H. A.; Nie, S.; Kopp, A.

2026-02-15 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.13.705815 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The individualization of serially repeated homologs is one route through which novel traits are thought to evolve. Under this model, a repeated character--like a limb, digit, or sensory bristle--is individualized from its homologs by changes in the regulatory apparatus ( character identity network, ChIN) that specifies its development. Individualization then enables downstream gene networks that build the repeated character to diverge from one another in different parts of the body, ultimately allowing new phenotypic endpoints to be reached. Despite this models intuitive appeal, the genetic mechanisms through which new ChINs rewire trait-building gene networks remain largely uncharacterized. A promising system in which to study this process is the Drosophila sex comb. Found in a sublineage of Drosophila species, the sex comb is a recently evolved, male-specific innovation that evolved from a more evolutionarily ancient precursor--the mechanosensory (MS) bristle--following the gain of a novel ChIN centered on the sex determination gene dsx and HOX gene Scr. Here, we use time-series single-cell RNA-seq to show that rather than co-opting new genes, this new ChIN orchestrates quantitative and heterochronic changes in the ancestral MS bristle transcriptome. These changes affect gene modules that control energy metabolism, endoreplication, and actin dynamics. The net effect of these changes is an organ-specific shift in developmental rate, leading to accelerated growth in sex comb teeth. Collectively, our work suggests that morphological innovation can proceed without the co-option of new genes into downstream trait-building networks and instead through metabolically driven differences in developmental rate between serial homologs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.