Energetic cross-talk of filter gate and lower helices drives polymodal regulation and disease in TREK K2P channels
Sun, H.; Tuerkaydin, B.; Rizzi, V.; Benkerdagh, C.; Ghysbrecht, S.; Aureli, S.; Baukrowitz, T.; Schewe, M.; Gervasio, F. L.
Show abstract
The TREK subfamily of two-pore domain potassium (K2P) channels are essential regulators of membrane excitability, and their activity is modulated by a wide range of physiological stimuli, including phosphorylation and membrane stretch. Single-site mutations in this subfamily have been identified in patients with FHEIG symptom (facial dysmorphism, hypertrichosis, epilepsy, intellectual disability/developmental delay, and gingival overgrowth), where they cause pathological channel hyperactivation. Using OneOPES framework, which unifies multiple enhanced-sampling molecular dynamics strategies, we provide a detailed energetic characterization of the TREK-2 conformational landscape. Our simulations uncover a unifying mechanism in which coupling between the lower transmembrane helices, the proximal C-terminal domain, and selectivity filter stability governs channel gating under different physiological stimuli, as well as disease-mimicking conditions. The predicted conformational effects of an FHEIG syndrome-associated mutation were further validated by electrophysiological measurements using a conformation-sensitive TREK-2 inhibitor. Together, these results establish an energetic framework for TREK-2 regulation and dysfunction and provide a foundation for structure-based drug discovery targeting the K2P TREK channel family.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From head to tail - Atomistic mechanism of long-range coupling from the cytosolic sensor domain to the selectivity filter in TREK K2P channels 99%
- Potassium dependent structural changes in the selectivity filter of HERG potassium channels 98%
- Mechanisms of activation and desensitization of full-length glycine receptor in membranes 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.