Back

Loss of competitive strength in European conifer species under climate change

Grünig, M.; Rammer, W.; Baumann, M.; Albrich, K.; Andre, F.; Augustynczik, A. L. D.; Bohn, F. J.; Bouwman, M.; Bugmann, H.; Collalti, A.; Cristal, I.; Dalmonech, D.; De Caceres, M.; De Coligny, F.; Dobor, L.; Dollinger, C.; Forrester, D. I.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Gonzalez-Olabarria, J. R.; Hiltner, U.; Hlasny, T.; Honkaniemi, J.; Huber, N.; Huth, A.; Jonard, M.; Jönsson, A. M.; Lagergren, F.; Mina, M.; Mohren, F.; Moos, C.; Morin, X.; Muys, B.; Nieberg, M.; Peltoniemi, M.; Reyer, C. P.; Storms, I.; Thom, D.; Toigo, M.; Seidl, R.

2026-02-15 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.13.705703 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is expected to alter species assemblages by affecting the outcome of competition between species. Investigating processes of competition remains challenging particularly in tree communities, as they unfold over extensive spatio-temporal scales. Here, we developed a deep-learning approach to leverage a novel database of 135 million simulated local-scale tree responses to climate across continental Europe to investigate changes in the competitiveness of nine major tree species under different scenarios of climate change. Specifically, we trained a Deep Neural Network on local process model projections to investigate climate change effects on indicators of competitive strength and species dominance. We found decreasing competitive strength for all investigated evergreen coniferous species across their distribution, while major deciduous broadleaved species such as Quercus robur and Fagus sylvatica increased in competitiveness. Changes in tree species competition with climate differed locally, but most investigated species lost competitive strength at their warm range edges. As a consequence of these changes, up to 19% of Europes forests could experience a change in the dominant tree species until the end of the 21st century. Our results suggest a profound climate-induced reassembly of Europes forests and identify areas that may require specific attention in forest policy and management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.8%
4
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
21
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
24
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
26
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%