Back

2-decade Study of Barriers to the Adoption of Organic Farming in Arid Lands ofJordan

AL-OUN, M.

2026-02-18 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.13.705472 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Organic farming supports environmental sustainability by saving water, safeguarding ecosystems, and providing economic opportunities through organic crops. It promotes food security and long-term development in the arid regions. However, its adoption in Jordan remains limited, primarily due to insufficient governmental support policies and measures. This study aims to identify the fundamental barriers to the adoption of organic agriculture in Jordans arid regions, evaluate farmers preparedness for organic practices, explore opportunities for organic farming, and propose recommendations to enhance its adoption. The study utilized a longitudinal approach, conducted in two phases over two decades. The first phase (April-September 2004) involved semi-structured interviews with 46 farmers and five focus groups. The second phase (July-September 2024) revisited seven experienced farmers from the initial cohort, using a phenomenological research approach a widely used approach. The results of phase 1 findings showed that the main barriers were technical, economic, marketing, legislation, institutional and extension and services while socio-cultural was not. The results of phase 2 highlighted persistence of the barriers identified in phase 1, alongside unresolved institutional difficulties, including certification processes, regulatory gaps, and limited market access. The study concluded that implementing streamlined certification procedures, government-supported subsidies, education programs, and policy modifications to promote sustainable adoption of organic farming and farmer engagement in Jorden. The limitation includes a small sample size, the two-decade gap between phases, and a focus on arid regions only. Further, it excludes other stakeholders perspectives, underexplores socio-cultural factors and provides limited analysis of certification, market access, and comparable contexts.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
42.1%
2
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
5
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
19
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
20
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
22
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%