Back

Plant-parasitic nematode microRNAs hijack plant AGO1 to induce host-cell reprogramming

Dussutour, A.; Noureddine, Y.; Da Rocha, M.; Yahmi, O.; Mohammed, A. T.; Mulet, K.; Foubert, P.; Seckin, E.; Cheng, A.-P.; Zervudacki, J.; Navarro, L.; Weiber, A.; Quentin, M.; Favery, B.; Jaubert, S.

2026-02-16 plant biology
10.64898/2026.02.13.705329 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cross-kingdom RNA interference (ckRNAi) is emerging as a mode of inter-organismal gene regulation, yet mechanistic examples in plant-metazoan interactions remain limited. Here, we demonstrate miRNA-driven ckRNAi in the nematode-plant pathosystem. Root-knot nematodes are among the most destructive plant pathogens, reprogramming root tissues to develop into galls containing multinucleated, hypermetabolic giant feeding cells essential for parasitism. AGO1-associated small-RNA immunoprecipitation (AGO1-RIP) from tomato galls revealed the selective in planta loading of 10 M. incognita miRNAs into host AGO1. Integrating degradome profiling, target prediction, and dual-luciferase reporter assays, we validated miRNA-directed silencing of nine tomato transcripts by four secreted nematode miRNAs. These targets map to major pathway classes involved in immune signaling, metabolic regulation, and cellular reprogramming linked to feeding-site establishment. Functional analyses further show that the nematode-secreted miR-2b is enhances giant feeding cell development. Comparative AGO1-RIP in Arabidopsis thaliana identified a conserved subset of AGO1-loaded nematode miRNAs, including miR-2b and miR-100, consistent with shared small-RNA effectors across hosts. Finally, the overlap between AGO1-loaded miRNA families and helminth secreted small-RNA repertoires supports evolutionary convergence on RNA-based virulence strategies. Collectively, our findings establish miRNA-mediated ckRNAi as a mechanistic component of plant-root-knot nematode interactions and provide a framework for leveraging RNA-based vulnerabilities for nematode control.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.