Back

AI-Driven Zero-Touch Network Orchestration for Tele-Radiology in Resource-Constrained Environments

Javed, M. Z.; Majeed, R.; Shafeeq, U.; Usman, H.; Ahmad, M.

2026-02-16 medical education
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346260 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe deployment of high-fidelity diagnostic Artificial Intelligence (AI) in resource-constrained environments is hindered by the stochastic nature of network latency and bandwidth limitations. Traditional tele-radiology relies on static cloud offloading, which introduces unacceptable latency for critical care scenarios. Zero-Touch Network and Service Management (ZSM) offers a paradigm for automated network orchestration, yet current frameworks lack application-layer awareness regarding clinical urgency and image complexity. MethodologyThis study proposes a novel Cross-Modal Latent Transformer (CMLT) integrated within a Zero-Touch Network Orchestration architecture. The system utilizes a lightweight Edge-Gating mechanism to dynamically partition inference tasks between edge nodes and cloud resources based on feature entropy. The model was trained and validated on the MIMIC-CXR (v2.0.0) (n = 377, 110) and CheXpert (n = 224, 316) datasets, employing a 70/10/20 split. ResultsThe proposed orchestration framework achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.962 [95% CI: 0.941-0.983] for Atelectasis detection, comparable to full-cloud inference, while reducing network bandwidth consumption by 64.3%. McNemars test indicated no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the orchestrated hybrid approach and the full-precision cloud baseline (p > 0.05), despite a 120 ms reduction in mean inference latency. Clinical SignificanceBy embedding clinical feature extraction directly into the network orchestration logic, this framework enables real-time, zero-touch provisioning of diagnostic resources, facilitating reliable AI deployment in rural and bandwidth-limited clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.