Back

Weight management needs in under-resourced communities elicited using storyboarding and a realist lens: A qualitative study

Brown, T. J.; Mahoney, K.; Naughton, F.; Tham, N. A. Q.; Khadjesari, Z.

2026-02-17 nutrition
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346241 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOverweight and obesity are causing growing public health, economic and clinical burden, particularly within under-resourced communities. There is an urgent need to develop an in-depth understanding of experiences of weight management, and preferences for support within under-resourced communities, with a view to developing more effective weight management interventions. MethodsFocus groups were run in under-resourced communities using storyboarding; a method to facilitate inclusive communication (n=37). Thematic analysis was applied to textual and visual data, and a realist lens applied to provide in-depth insight into weight management experiences and needs. We believe this is the first study to use this combined methodology to explore weight management experiences and needs. ResultsCombining storyboarding with a realist lens, generated four themes. Living circumstances indicated that mental health, individual needs, and cost of weight management services were key contextual factors. Mechanisms of weight management identified emotional eating and portion control to be central to individual weight management. Yo-yo dieting centred on participants experiences of weight regain after attempting weight loss. Weight management intervention needs indicated psychological support was perceived as severely lacking, and the only route to attain sustained weight management. Offering both in-person and online support for weight management was considered important to reach more people. ConclusionMoving weight management support from short- to long-term and incorporating more robust psychological support would better serve the needs of people living in under-resourced communities who are overweight or obese. Ideally interventions should be multicomponent and tailored to individual needs and circumstances.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.5%
2
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
7
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
9
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%