Back

Leftover Infant Milk After Bottle Feeding: Parental Practices and Microbiological Findings

Zychlinsky, A. K.; Sedlacek, L.; Mekonnen de Oliveira, A.; Liolios, I.; Ritter, S.; Fuchs, F.; Happle, C.

2026-02-16 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346179 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceCurrent guidelines from the World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine recommend discarding all milk remaining in bottles immediately after infant feeding. However, these recommendations lack supporting microbiological evidence from studies of actual infant feeding, imposing substantial financial and emotional burden on the 78 million families worldwide who bottle-feed their infants. ObjectiveTo determine (1) the financial, emotional, and time burden associated with bottle feeding and parental milk disposal practices, and (2) bacterial growth in leftover human milk and formula under different storage conditions. Design(1) Cross-sectional online survey (January 2023-February 2024) and (2) prospective microbiological cohort study. Setting(1) Online survey, (2) infants recruited in Hannover, Germany Participants(1) Survey respondents (n=1056; 99% mothers) and (2) healthy, full-term, bottle-fed infants (n=44; 17 humanmilk, 27 formula) aged 0-12 months. Main Outcomes and MeasuresParental burden scores, milk disposal frequency, and bacterial colony-forming units (CFU)/ml in milk samples before feeding, immediately after feeding, and at 4, 8, and 24 hours post-feeding at 4{degrees}C and 20{degrees}C. ResultsAmong surveyed parents, 46% discarded leftover milk daily, yet 84% reported they would keep milk longer if deemed safe. In microbiological testing, median bacterial burden in humanmilk increased from 4200 CFU/ml (range 300-350,000) pre-feeding to 24,600 CFU/ml (range 1900-29,004,400) post-feeding, but showed no significant further increase at 4 hours (p=0.82) or 8 hours (p=0.64) when stored at either 4{degrees}C or 20{degrees}C. Formula showed similar stability: median CFU/ml increased from 0 (range 0-10,700) to 11,700 (range 1900-630,000) post-feeding, with no significant change at 4 hours (p=0.91) or 8 hours (p=0.73) at either temperature. Significant bacterial growth occurred only after 24 hours at 20{degrees}C (p<0.001). Conclusions and RelevanceBacterial burden in leftover infant milk remained stable below concerning thresholds for 8 hours when refrigerated and 4-8 hours at room temperature, challenging current guidelines that mandate immediate disposal. Evidence-based guideline revision could reduce financial burden and milk waste for families around the globe without compromising infant safety. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow long is it safe to offer leftover milk in a bottle to an infant that has previously drunk from it? FindingsThe number of bacteria in leftover human milk or formula did not significantly increase from 0 to 8h post-feeding in milk bottles sampled from 44 infants, regardless of whether the milk was kept at room temperature or refrigerated. MeaningLeftover milk may be safely reoffered beyond the limits of the current guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
5
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
11
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
16
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%