Biological embedding of the pyscho-social environment; an Epigenetic Analysis of Adversity from Early-life to Adulthood
Buchanan, M.; Le Cleac'h, J.; Meriaux, S. B.; Turner, J. D.; Mposhi, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionResearch has shown that social and physical stressors of early-life adversity (ELA) can negatively affect long-term health trajectories. Despite differences in types of ELA exposure, previous studies have identified common health-related outcomes in adults who had experienced less favourable conditions during developmentally sensitive periods. This meta-analysis investigates the potential role of DNA methylation in mediating these adverse health trajectories by identifying common biological signatures across cohorts with distinct adversity exposures and environmental backgrounds. Materials and MethodsDNA methylation data from previously published studies was used to perform a meta-analysis on 227 individuals across three cohorts. These include the EpiPath cohort consisting of adults who were exposed early institutional care, ImmunoTwin cohort consisting of adversity discordant monozygotic twin pairs and lastly a cohort of young children exposed to early institutional care. ResultsDNA methylation analysis across the three cohorts revealed differential methylation at CpG loci associated with 15 genes common to all cohorts. These genes are involved in neuronal development, chromatin remodeling and metabolism. Pathway enrichment analysis of the combined dataset showed potential associations with oxytocin signalling, regulation of nervous system development, and calcium signalling in relation to the later-life phenotype of the adversity exposed individuals. In addition, a poly-epigenetic score was developed by identifying a subset of 200 differentially methylated CpG sites through PLS-DA analysis with the combined beta matrix of these cohorts. ConclusionThis study highlights the long-term impact of adversity by identifying common DNA methylation signatures of negative life experiences across three cohorts. The development of a poly-epigenetic score represents the first steps towards identifying group differences by combining weighted methylation values for CpG sites of interest. This method illustrates the potential to track changes in individuals across long-term studies that may benefit research in lifelong healthoutcomes.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intergenerational transmission of complex traits and the offspring methylome 94%
- Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide associations between DNA methylation at birth and childhood cognitive skills. 94%
- DNA methylation and general psychopathology in childhood: An epigenome-wide meta-analysis from the PACE consortium 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA Methylation as a Potential Mediator of the Association Between Prenatal Tobacco and Alcohol Exposure and Child Neurodevelopment in a South African Birth Cohort 94%
- The DNA methylation landscape of the human oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR): Recommendations for future research 94%
- Epigenetic aging and perceived psychological stress in old age 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Polymethylation Scores for Prenatal Maternal Smoke Exposure Persist Until Age 15 and Are Detected in Saliva in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Cohort 94%
- Does genetic predisposition modify the effect of lifestyle-related factors on DNA methylation? 94%
- Updates to data versions and analytic methods influence the reproducibility of results from epigenome-wide association studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the epigenetic mechanisms of childhood adversity and sensitive periods: a gene set-based approach 93%
- Relationship between constitutive and acute gene regulation, and physiological and behavioral responses, mediated by the neuropeptide PACAP 92%
- Effects of acute psychological stress on blood cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA): A crossover experimental study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.