Back

Inferring population-level physiologically based model parameters for sleep in infancy and young childhood

Webb, L.; Phillips, A. J.; Roberts, J. A.

2026-02-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.12.705640 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The sleep patterns of infants and young children differ from adult sleep patterns, with longer duration and multiple bouts per 24 hours. There is also considerable heterogeneity in infant sleep, both between individuals and within individuals across development. While mathematical models have been used to understand the mechanisms that regulate adult sleep, the development of sleep from infancy through early childhood has remained largely unexplored. Here we used an established mathematical model for adult sleep regulation to investigate how the underlying mechanisms of sleep mature from ages 1 month to 5 years, and identify a basis for inter-individual differences at each age. Using a Bayesian approach to estimate joint distributions of model parameters at different ages, we found that: (i) decreases in the rate of accumulation of sleep homeostatic pressure captured the reduction in sleep duration across development; while (ii) increases in the time scale of the sleep homeostatic drive captured the consolidation of sleep into fewer sleep bouts per day across development. In terms of inter-individual differences, we found larger spread in the parameters within the earlier stages of infancy (<1 year). The center and boundaries of the joint distributions evolved with age through the parameter space, converging towards previously described adult parameter values. A bifurcation analysis of the homeostatic timescale parameter revealed that progressive consolidation of sleep occurs through abrupt loss of bouts one at a time, punctuated by narrow intervals of greater-than-24 h cycles. These results establish plausible, population-level trajectories in physiological parameters underpinning maturation of sleep regulation through infancy and early childhood.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.