Back

Inference of Cichlid Speciation Patterns is Dependent on Spatial Covariance and Species Delimitation

Hay, E. M.; Borstein, S. R.; McGee, M. D.

2026-02-14 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.12.705618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macroevolutionary analyses typically treat species as discrete units and account for shared evolutionary history. However, speciation is a continuous process and taxa are often spatially clustered, potentially biasing inferences of diversification. Here, we investigate how species delimitation and spatial non-independence influence speciation dynamics and inferred drivers using cichlid fishes as a model system. Using a phylogeny and trait dataset of 1,712 species, we first generated a reduced dataset of 820 species by removing incipient species based on known breeding compatibilities. We then fit phylogenetic and spatiophylogenetic models using an integrated nested Laplace approximation framework to jointly account for phylogenetic and spatial covariance. We find that the treatment of incipient species and spatial non-independence both alter speciation patterns and inferred drivers. Analyses of the full phylogeny identified strong trait associations and spatial hotspots driven by young adaptive radiations in Lake Victoria and Lake Malawi, whereas removing incipient species and accounting for spatial non-independence reduced extreme speciation rates, weakened or removed trait effects, and largely eliminated spatial hotspots. These results demonstrate that macroevolutionary inference is sensitive to species delimitation and spatial structure, highlighting the need to consider the influence of incipient species and spatial covariance in comparative analyses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.9%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
4
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
20
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%